bmad-editorial-review-prose

To review prose for clarity without altering meaning, you need an editorial process that suggests minimal fixes for ambiguity and grammar. This approach returns structured revisions in a three-column table while preserving the author's original voice and intent.

Yes, you can copyedit markdown documentation while skipping code blocks, frontmatter, and structural markup. A context-aware editorial review targets only the prose text, ensuring that technical formatting and configuration sections remain completely untouched.

Applying Microsoft Writing Style Guide principles to product copy involves checking text for communication issues that impede comprehension. The review deduplicates findings and outputs only the minimal suggested fixes needed to align the prose with established clarity standards.

Editorial review works seamlessly with plain text, markdown, and text-heavy XML files. The process identifies comprehension issues across these formats while automatically bypassing structural markup, ensuring that only human-readable prose receives copyediting suggestions.

To get structured editorial feedback before publication, request a review that returns findings in a three-column format containing original text, revised text, and explanations. This structured output provides deduped, minimal edits that clarify confusing wording without extensive manual proofreading.