bmad-editorial-review-prose

Review prose for comprehension issues and propose minimal editorial fixes.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GenEducation/GenedUIProject --skill bmad-editorial-review-prose-geneducation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-editorial-review-prose
Source: https://github.com/GenEducation/GenedUIProject/tree/main/.gemini/skills/bmad-editorial-review-prose
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GenEducation/GenedUIProject --skill bmad-editorial-review-prose-geneducation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill reviews prose for communication problems that block understanding, so you can improve clarity without rewriting for style preference.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Clinical editorial review: Finds issues such as grammar errors, ambiguous phrasing, redundancy, and broken flow that materially affect comprehension.
  • Minimal-change suggestions: Preserves the original structure and voice while proposing the smallest possible fix for each issue.
  • Mixed-content handling: Skips code blocks, frontmatter, and markup so only real prose is reviewed.
  • Use case: Use it to review a draft article, product update, or internal document and receive a concise table of exact passages, revisions, and explanations.

Quick Start

Ask the Skill to review the provided text for editorial issues and return the findings in a three-column table.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-editorial-review-prose

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review markdown prose for clarity and grammar errors?

Markdown prose review targets communication issues like grammar errors and ambiguous phrasing that block understanding. It proposes minimal editorial fixes in a concise table, preserving the original structure and voice without rewriting for style preference.

Does prose review work on plain text and text-heavy XML documents?

Yes, editorial prose review works on plain text, markdown, and text-heavy XML. It skips frontmatter and markup, focusing strictly on readable business, product, and documentation content to ensure only real prose is evaluated.

What is the best way to fix unclear prose without changing the original voice?

Fixing unclear prose without changing the original voice requires minimal-change editorial suggestions. The Skill proposes the smallest possible fix for each comprehension issue, preserving the original structure while resolving redundancy and broken flow.

How do I consolidate duplicate editorial issues when copyediting a draft article?

To consolidate duplicate editorial issues when copyediting, the Skill applies strict validation and groups identical problems across the document. This ensures your review table contains concise, unique findings rather than repeated entries for the same prose issue.

When should I not use automated editorial feedback for document revisions?

You should not use automated editorial feedback when you want stylistic rewriting or creative restructuring. This Skill focuses strictly on resolving comprehension problems like ambiguity and broken flow, intentionally avoiding style preference changes.