bmad-editorial-review-prose

To review clinical prose for clarity without altering the author's voice, apply minimal-intervention copyediting that flags comprehension barriers and proposes professional revisions based on the Microsoft Writing Style Guide. This preserves the original tone while improving reader understanding.

The best way to copyedit text-heavy markdown while skipping code blocks is to use an editorial review process that identifies communication issues in prose and outputs a three-column markdown table of original text, revised text, and change rationale.

Yes, you can get deduplicated and merged editorial review suggestions for overlapping writing issues. The review process combines repeated issues into single table entries with locations, ensuring conflict-free and minimal revisions to enhance clinical prose comprehension.

To identify communication issues that impede comprehension in plain text documents, perform an issue-focused editorial review. This process isolates clarity barriers and generates minimal, professional revisions formatted as a markdown table showing the original, revised, and rationale.

Yes, this editorial review tool works with XML formats containing text-heavy content. It processes the prose to identify comprehension barriers and proposes minimal revisions while skipping structural markup, returning a three-column markdown table of original, revised, and rationale.

You should not use minimal revisions for clinical copyediting when the text requires a complete rewrite for preference rather than clarity. This approach focuses strictly on flagging comprehension barriers and applying the smallest changes needed to improve understanding.