bmad-editorial-review-structure

To improve document structure, you can perform an editorial review that evaluates headings, section order, and redundancy. This process proposes cuts, merges, and moves to enhance clarity and flow while preserving the original meaning.

Editorial review for content editing is a structural assessment that identifies scope and redundancy issues before copy editing. You need it when a long draft, README, or guide becomes difficult to scan and requires condensation to improve reader comprehension.

Reviewing a document's structure requires purpose alignment and section-level analysis to identify structural problems. You then generate prioritized recommendations for moving and merging sections to correct scope and improve overall flow.

Yes, condensing long structured documents involves proposing targeted cuts and merges while maintaining purpose alignment. This ensures you reduce unnecessary content and clutter while fully preserving reader comprehension and core message delivery.

The best way to edit a repetitive draft is applying section-level analysis to find redundancy and scope issues. You then execute prioritized structural changes like moves and condensation to produce a clearer, easily scannable version.

Document structure review needs purpose alignment to ensure proposed cuts, merges, and condensation do not remove essential context. It anchors the section-level analysis so recommendations preserve comprehension while eliminating unnecessary content.