skills.rest
b566776
b566776COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Analyze content and surface at least ten issues as a Markdown list.

Updated May 5, 2026
Search Tags:#analysis#content#review#report#adversarial#findings
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/b566776/whitebox --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-b566776
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/b566776/whitebox/tree/main/.gemini/skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/b566776/whitebox --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-b566776

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a rigorous adversarial review of content to surface issues, gaps, and improvement opportunities, helping teams strengthen clarity, logic, and quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Conducts a skeptical, meticulous evaluation of drafts, diffs, specs, stories, or documents.
  • Generates a findings report that identifies at least ten issues and actionable improvements.
  • Use case: vet a product spec or a draft article to enhance argumentation, accuracy, and coherence.

Quick Start

Provide a rigorous adversarial review of the given content and output a concise findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial review on a technical document or spec?▼

An adversarial review evaluates drafts, specs, or diffs with a skeptical lens to identify gaps, logical flaws, and improvement opportunities. It generates a Markdown report containing at least ten actionable findings to strengthen content clarity and accuracy.

Can I use this to review code diffs and user stories?▼

Yes, you can review code diffs and user stories. The analysis accepts diffs, specs, stories, and documents, meticulously evaluating them to surface at least ten objective issues and actionable improvement recommendations.

What is the minimum number of findings generated during a content review?▼

The content review generates a minimum of ten findings. It guarantees identifying at least ten issues or improvement opportunities and delivers them as a concise Markdown list.

Does the adversarial review focus on criticizing the author or the content?▼

The adversarial review focuses strictly on the content. It delivers thorough, objective, and actionable recommendations while explicitly avoiding personal attacks against the author.

What format does the findings report use for the review output?▼

The findings report uses a Markdown list format. It presents the identified issues and actionable improvement opportunities as a concise, structured Markdown document.

When do I need an adversarial content review for my drafts?▼

You need an adversarial content review when vetting a product spec or draft article to enhance argumentation, accuracy, and coherence. It helps teams rigorously strengthen content clarity and logic before finalizing documents.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
GenEducationGenEducation

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Identify defects, gaps, and weak assumptions in submitted content with Markdown findings.

Official
Basic
Mekann2904Mekann2904

logical-analysis

Analyze textual documents for structure, concepts, and argument validity.

Community
Advanced
martiraste-lgtmmartiraste-lgtm

grammar-check

Identify and fix grammar, logic, and flow issues in text.

Community
Advanced
MarkusonMarkuson

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Review technical specifications, code diffs, and documentation for hidden flaws.

Community
Basic