bmad-review-adversarial-general

To perform an adversarial code review, you need a structured workflow that applies a cynical, skeptical lens to your code diff to identify at least ten potential flaws, security vulnerabilities, or best practice violations.

An adversarial review is a critical analysis process that simulates a skeptical reviewer to uncover weaknesses in documents or artifacts. Use it when you need a rigorous assessment to find omissions and areas for improvement before final delivery.

Yes, you can apply skeptical analysis to non-code artifacts. The review process is designed for document critiques and artifact analysis, generating a structured list of actionable findings wherever a critical perspective is required.

You generate a structured list of findings by submitting your code diff to a cynical review workflow. The process mandates the identification of a minimum of ten issues based on professional skepticism, producing actionable critique results.

A primary limitation of cynical review is its strict requirement to find at least ten issues, which may force negative findings on high-quality content. It focuses exclusively on critique and does not provide positive reinforcement or structural praise.