skills.rest
tronghieu
tronghieuCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Review user-provided content and output at least ten issues as a Markdown list.

36|16|Updated May 1, 2026
Search Tags:#documentation#diff review#adversarial review#findings report#spec analysis#critical feedback
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tronghieu/lumina-wiki --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-tronghieu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/tronghieu/lumina-wiki/tree/main/.agents/skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tronghieu/lumina-wiki --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-tronghieu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you get a critical, skeptical review of any submitted content so you can uncover weaknesses, gaps, and issues before they cause downstream problems.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Cynical adversarial analysis: Reviews content with extreme skepticism to surface at least ten issues.
  • Flexible input scope: Works for diffs, specs, stories, documents, and other artifacts.
  • Structured findings output: Produces a Markdown list of descriptions-only findings.

Quick Start

Ask for an adversarial review by saying, "Please review this spec and produce a cynical findings report with at least ten issues."

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial review on a spec or document to find missing details?▼

Adversarial review applies extreme skepticism to your documents or diffs to uncover weaknesses. It analyzes the provided content and outputs a Markdown list of at least ten actionable issues, focusing strictly on descriptions of critical problems and missing details.

Can I use adversarial review to critique code diffs and identify specific risks?▼

Yes, adversarial review works for code diffs. It applies skeptical analysis to the provided diff content, generating a Markdown list of at least ten actionable issues that expose critical problems and missing details before they cause downstream issues.

What is the minimum number of findings generated during a cynical spec analysis?▼

A cynical spec analysis generates a minimum of ten actionable issues. This findings-oriented critique ensures you receive a harsh review of your documents, exposing critical problems and missing details in a structured Markdown list format.

Does the adversarial review output include suggested fixes for the issues found?▼

No, the output does not include suggested fixes. The review produces a Markdown list of descriptions only, strictly focusing on surfacing a minimum of ten actionable issues and critical problems rather than providing solutions or recommendations.

How do I get critical feedback on my stories and documents before downstream implementation?▼

To get critical feedback, submit your stories or documents for harsh adversarial review. The process applies skeptical analysis to your artifacts, generating a Markdown list of at least ten actionable issues to address before downstream implementation.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
b566776b566776

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Analyze content and surface at least ten issues as a Markdown list.

Community
Advanced
DavidsonGomesDavidsonGomes

evo-review-adversarial-general

Identify at least ten gaps, inconsistencies, and risks in content artifacts.

Community
Advanced
haryelramalhoharyelramalho

review

Compare HEAD against a fixed point and analyze code diffs.

Community
Advanced
geekdesign27geekdesign27

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Critically review content and output at least ten issues as a Markdown list.

Community
Intermediate