bmad-review-adversarial-general

An adversarial review simulates a skeptical reviewer to critically analyze your feature specification, uncovering at least ten missing elements and potential problems. It outputs findings as a structured Markdown list for easy tracking.

Finding flaws in a code diff requires a cynical critical review that applies skeptical analysis to uncover at least ten issues or areas for improvement. It outputs the findings as a clear Markdown list.

You can critically review user stories to ensure all potential edge cases and ambiguities are addressed. The review simulates an experienced reviewer to uncover at least ten issues or areas for improvement before development begins.

This critical review method works on technical documentation, specifications, and code diffs. It performs a deep skeptical analysis to identify at least ten issues or areas for improvement, outputting findings as a concise Markdown list.

To get a structured Markdown list of issues, perform a cynical and critical review of your document. The process requires skeptical analysis to uncover at least ten missing elements and potential problems, outputting findings directly as a Markdown list.