skills.rest
tabesink
tabesinkCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Performs adversarial review of user-submitted content and outputs Markdown issue list.

Updated May 3, 2026
Search Tags:#quality assurance#specification#diff review#adversarial review#critical feedback#risk finding
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tabesink/deepdoc-agent --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-tabesink
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/tabesink/deepdoc-agent/tree/main/.cursor/skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tabesink/deepdoc-agent --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-tabesink

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you uncover hidden issues and weak spots in a piece of content by forcing an adversarial, skeptical review that produces actionable findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial review mindset: Treats the submitted artifact as error-prone and actively looks for omissions, inconsistencies, and weak reasoning.
  • Minimum findings requirement: Produces at least ten issues (or halts if none can be found), ensuring the output is genuinely evaluative.
  • Finding report in Markdown: Returns a Markdown list of descriptions focused on what to fix and improve.
  • Use Case: Review a specification draft or PR description to identify missing requirements, unclear definitions, and edge cases before implementation or release.

Quick Start

Ask for a critical review by providing the content you want assessed and optionally the aspects you want the review to prioritize.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial review on a specification draft to find hidden flaws?▼

An adversarial review treats your specification draft as error-prone, applying skeptical analysis to uncover omissions, inconsistencies, and weak reasoning before implementation. It returns a Markdown list of actionable issue descriptions focused on what to fix.

What is adversarial diff review and how does it identify defects?▼

Adversarial diff review actively scrutinizes submitted artifacts for defects and weaknesses using a cynical mindset. It forces skeptical analysis to find inconsistencies and edge cases, outputting a Markdown list of critical findings requiring a minimum set of issues to be actionable.

Can I use critical feedback review for documents with missing requirements?▼

Yes, critical feedback review applies to documents and stories to identify missing requirements and unclear definitions. It evaluates the content and provides a Markdown list of descriptions detailing exactly what needs improvement.

Does adversarial review work on empty input or zero findings?▼

Adversarial review halts automatically when processing empty input or if zero findings can be discovered. This ensures the output remains genuinely evaluative and only returns a Markdown list when critical issues are actually identified.

Related Skills

Explore More Legal & Compliance Skills→
mol4mol4
1

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Identify defects and inconsistencies in submitted content and produce a Markdown findings report.

Community
Basic
Rinzler78Rinzler78
1

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Review content for weaknesses, omissions, and defects with a Markdown findings list.

Community
Basic
Asharf30Asharf30

speckit-checklist

Generate domain-specific checklists to validate technical requirements in specification files.

Community
Intermediate
enigmaicon-engenigmaicon-eng
1

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Performs adversarial critiques of submitted artifacts and outputs Markdown lists of findings.

Community
Basic