board-meeting

To structure a strategic board meeting, this Skill runs a six-phase process that gathers isolated C-level perspectives, applies adversarial critique, synthesizes discussion, and pauses for founder review to extract a clear decision. It prevents groupthink through isolated executive role contributions before final synthesis.

The best way to run multi-agent executive deliberation is to activate relevant C-suite roles based on the topic, gather their isolated perspectives, and run an adversarial critique phase. This approach prevents groupthink and synthesizes multiple executive perspectives into a clear founder-ready outcome for market expansion.

Yes, you can use this for C-level strategy reviews covering pricing decisions, technology tradeoffs, hiring discussions, and product direction. It structures executive deliberations by activating relevant C-suite roles based on the specific strategic topic being reviewed.

Decision logging works by separating approved decisions from raw transcripts in a two-layer memory separation. This ensures future meetings reference only validated outcomes, preventing rejected ideas from raw discussions from contaminating subsequent strategic deliberations.

Yes, you need to provide context as the first phase loads it before gathering isolated executive perspectives. The Skill then uses this context to guide the adversarial critique and synthesis phases toward a founder-ready recommendation with next steps.

An adversarial critique phase is used to remove ambiguity from high-stakes strategic decisions by preventing groupthink. By isolating role contributions and running critic analysis before synthesis, it ensures multiple executive perspectives are genuinely independent rather than influenced by immediate group discussion.