brief-section-drafter

Drafting litigation document sections aligned to a case theory involves loading internal style guidelines and case context, then generating targeted section drafts such as facts and reasons, agency opinions, appeal requests, or retrial applications while enforcing citation discipline.

Flagging unverified facts in legal writing uses structured inline tags like [需核实] or [不确定] to mark specific text segments, ensuring that lawyers can systematically review and verify uncertain claims before finalizing the litigation document for submission.

Yes, drafting appeal requests and retrial applications is fully supported, as the tool targets common litigation workflow sections including facts-and-reasons, legal arguments, agency opinions, and retrial applications while maintaining case theory consistency.

Citation and verification marking enforces precise fact-to-evidence and rule-to-section citation during legal argument drafting, requiring the system to explicitly tag any uncertain or unverified statements that need a lawyer's review before final submission.

Yes, a configured CLAUDE.md context is required to source internal guidance and case theory, providing the necessary internal writing style and legal framework needed to produce a consistent first draft rather than a final submission.