researcher-agent

Aggregate external sources and evidence with clear citations.

Updated Mar 30, 2026

Search Tags:#research #citations #standards #evidence #synthesis #policy #sources

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server --skill researcher-agent

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: researcher-agent
Source: https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server/tree/main/skills/researcher-agent
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server --skill researcher-agent

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Gather external sources, standards, policy references, and evidence-backed findings with clear citations and unresolved questions to support research, standards mapping, public policy lookup, and evidence extraction before drafting or decision-making.

Core Features & Use Cases

Gather sources from diverse domains (policy pages, standards documents, reports)
Extract relevant evidence and clearly separate facts from interpretation
Synthesize findings with citations and identify unresolved questions for downstream drafting or review

Quick Start

Instruct the agent to gather external sources, extract evidence, and compile a citation-backed synthesis for a specified topic.

Frequently Asked Questions about researcher-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I gather external sources and extract evidence with proper citations?▼

To gather external sources and extract evidence with citations, aggregate diverse documents like policy pages and reports, then synthesize findings while clearly separating facts from interpretation. This approach ensures verifiable sourcing and distinguishes factual evidence from subjective analysis.

What is the best way to synthesize public policy references for decision-making?▼

The best way to synthesize public policy references is to aggregate external sources, extract relevant evidence, and compile a citation-backed synthesis. This process marks unresolved questions to inform downstream drafting and support transparent decision-making.

Can I use this for standards mapping and evidence extraction across different domains?▼

Yes, you can use this approach for standards mapping and evidence extraction across different domains. It gathers sources from diverse areas, applies verifiable sourcing methods, and clearly separates factual evidence from interpretation to support comprehensive standards analysis.

How does evidence synthesis distinguish fact from interpretation?▼

Evidence synthesis distinguishes fact from interpretation by applying verifiable sourcing to aggregated external materials. It extracts relevant evidence from policy references and reports, clearly separating objective facts from subjective analysis while marking unresolved questions.

What should I do when research leaves unresolved questions before drafting?▼

When research leaves unresolved questions before drafting, compile a citation-backed synthesis that explicitly marks those gaps. Distinguishing unresolved questions from extracted facts ensures downstream review processes can address missing evidence before final decision-making.