What problem does it solve?
A lawyer needs a reliable, source-attributed chronology that answers what happened when, based strictly on supplied legal materials rather than guesswork.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Sourced event extraction: Converts documents (e.g., emails, pleadings, correspondence, witness evidence, disclosure exports) into a structured sequence of dated events with supporting quotes and identifiers.
- De-duplication and conflict detection: Merges repeated events while preserving multiple source trails, flags contradictions, and marks disputed or low-confidence entries for lawyer review.
- Gap and verification support: Produces explicit lists of missing periods, missing counterparties/custodians, referred-but-unsupplied items, and verification checklists to guide further document requests.
- Multiple output shapes: Generates a working chronology plus optional witness-specific, issue-specific, or statement-of-facts variants while preventing unverified inference.
Quick Start
Use building-chronologies to create a working chronology from the attached disclosure and correspondence bundle, citing each event with a quote, source identifier, and confidence, and listing gaps where key sources are missing.