chronology

Extracts, deduplicates, and tags dated legal events from case documents into formatted chronologies for litigation workflows.

17|4|Updated May 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AlsKozlov/ru-legal --skill chronology-alskozlov
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: chronology
Source: https://github.com/AlsKozlov/ru-legal/tree/main/packs/litigation/skills/chronology
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AlsKozlov/ru-legal --skill chronology-alskozlov

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Litigation teams waste hours manually compiling timelines of events from scattered case documents, often missing critical facts or introducing errors that weaken legal arguments. This Skill automates the process to produce accurate, significance-tagged chronologies tailored for legal proceedings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Event Extraction: Pulls dated events from case documents with full source attribution and witness identification.
  • Significance Tagging: Labels events as critical, important, or background to prioritize key facts for legal arguments.
  • Multi-Format Output: Generates internal working tables, formal Statements of Facts for pleadings, and witness-specific timelines for testimony preparation.
  • Use Case: For a contract dispute matter, use this Skill to compile all key events from contracts, shipping records, and pre-trial correspondence into a tagged chronology ready for a court hearing.

Quick Start

Use the chronology skill to generate a significance-tagged timeline of all key events for your litigation matter using the attached case documents.

Frequently Asked Questions about chronology

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build a legal chronology from scattered case documents?

Build a legal chronology by extracting, deduplicating, and tagging dated events from scattered case documents. This process produces structured timeline outputs with source attribution and standardized date formatting to support legal argument development.

Can I generate a Statement of Facts from case files automatically?

Yes, you can generate a formal Statement of Facts from case files by extracting dated legal events and formatting them into a structured chronology tailored for pleadings and legal proceedings. This includes significance tagging and source attribution.

What is significance tagging in a litigation event timeline?

Significance tagging in a litigation timeline labels extracted legal events as critical, important, or background. This prioritizes key facts from case files to support legal argument development and witness testimony preparation.

Does automated chronology extraction work for contract dispute preparation?

Automated chronology extraction works for contract dispute preparation by pulling dated events from contracts, shipping records, and pre-trial correspondence. It compiles these into a significance-tagged timeline ready for court hearings and civil litigation workflows.

How do I prepare a witness-specific timeline for testimony?

Prepare a witness-specific timeline by extracting dated legal events from case documents and organizing them with witness identification. This produces structured chronology outputs tailored for testimony preparation in pre-trial litigation workflows.

What is the best way to compile a pre-trial timeline from case files?

The best way to compile a pre-trial timeline is to automate event extraction from case documents, apply significance tagging, and generate multi-format outputs including working tables and Statements of Facts. This ensures accurate factual event compilation for hearings.