by-scoring

Compute and interpret BY ipSAE, ipTM, and composite scores from PAE matrices.

104|10|Updated Mar 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/001TMF/blatant-why --skill by-scoring
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: by-scoring
Source: https://github.com/001TMF/blatant-why/tree/main/templates/.claude/skills/by-scoring
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/001TMF/blatant-why --skill by-scoring

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires numpy, pandas, matplotlib, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

BY Scoring interprets and applies BY's custom scoring metrics — ipSAE, ipTM, pLDDT, RMSD, liability counts, and the composite ranking formula — to rank antibody, nanobody, and de novo designs based on interface confidence, global topology, and manufacturability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interpret ipSAE_min, ipTM, pLDDT_mean, RMSD, liability counts, and the BY composite score.
  • Use this skill when scoring designs after BoltzGen refolding, ranking panels, troubleshooting metric disagreements, or advising on candidate ranking decisions.
  • Supports single-design scoring, multi-seed scoring, and batch ranking with hard filters by modality; outputs include per-design metrics and a final verdict.

Quick Start

Run the BY scoring workflow on a Protenix output to produce ipsae_min, iptm, and a composite ranking.

Frequently Asked Questions about by-scoring

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compute ipSAE and ipTM scores from a PAE matrix for antibody design ranking?

BY scoring computes ipSAE and ipTM scores from a PAE matrix and chain assignments to evaluate interface confidence, producing per-design metrics and a composite ranking for antibody and nanobody designs.

What is the BY composite score used for when ranking de novo designs?

The BY composite score ranks de novo designs by combining ipSAE_min, ipTM, pLDDT_mean, RMSD, and liability counts into a unified metric reflecting interface confidence, global topology, and manufacturability for final verdicts.

How do I run multi-seed scoring and batch ranking with hard filters by modality?

Apply multi-seed scoring and batch ranking by processing PAE matrices across seeds with hard modality filters, generating per-design ipSAE, ipTM, composite scores, ranks, and verdicts for candidate panels.

Does BY scoring work with Protenix outputs for evaluating refolded designs?

Yes, BY scoring processes Protenix outputs by interpreting PAE matrices to score designs after refolding, calculating ipsae_min, iptm, pLDDT_mean, and composite rankings to guide candidate selection decisions.

Why do my ipSAE and ipTM metric results disagree when troubleshooting design rankings?

Metric disagreements arise because ipSAE measures interface confidence while ipTM captures global topology; BY scoring resolves this by computing a liability-based composite score and final verdict to rank designs consistently.