case-strength-assessor

To assess immigration case strength, map indexed documents to specific O-1A or EB-1A criteria and assign tiered evidence ratings. This pre-draft evaluation identifies weak or unsupported evidence early, preventing teams from drafting petitions built on miscategorized materials.

Evaluating NIW Dhanasar prongs involves reading the document index and mapping evidence to each prong. The assessment assigns tiered evidence ratings and corroboration notes, synthesizing overall drafting readiness and checking if the indexed documents adequately support the national interest claim.

Rating evidence tiers requires mapping indexed documents to petition criteria and assigning each item a tier from 1 to 4. The process includes noting corroboration status for each piece of evidence to determine if the overall case is strong, moderate, weak, or unsupported.

You can check case readiness by operating exclusively on the document index without reading full documents. The assessment reads the index to map evidence to criteria, assigns tiered ratings, and synthesizes drafting readiness to identify gaps and recommend sequencing before narrative drafting.

You need a document index, typically produced by a document-summary arrangement tool, to perform the assessment. Providing the path to this index file and specifying the target petition type (O-1A, EB-1A, or NIW) allows the evaluation to map evidence and rate case strength accurately.

The limitation is that the assessment relies solely on the document index rather than the full text of the evidence. It provides an honest strength check and identifies gaps before drafting, but does not draft the narrative or evaluate the qualitative details of the underlying documents.