ccg

Route one task through three model roles and reconcile disagreements into a final answer.

Updated May 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HyperionBurn/searchv1beta --skill ccg-hyperionburn
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ccg
Source: https://github.com/HyperionBurn/searchv1beta/tree/main/.github/skills/ccg
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HyperionBurn/searchv1beta --skill ccg-hyperionburn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It reduces the risk of wrong or one-sided outputs by routing the same task through multiple AI perspectives and then reconciling differences into a single decision-ready result.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel tri-model orchestration: Runs Codex, Gemini, and synthesis in parallel for faster multi-perspective responses.
  • Conflict-aware synthesis: Explicitly calls out where models disagree, then selects a final direction with rationale.
  • Use-case fit: Code review from multiple angles, architecture plus UX in one request, and cross-validation when answers may diverge.

Quick Start

Ask for it in one message like: /ccg Review this PR for architecture/security and UX readability.

Frequently Asked Questions about ccg

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I cross-validate AI answers for code review and architecture decisions?

Cross-validate AI answers by routing the same request through three model roles in parallel, then synthesizing disagreements into a single decision-ready result with an actionable checklist.

What is multi-model synthesis for reducing one-sided AI outputs?

Multi-model synthesis is a cross-validation technique that runs a single task through multiple AI perspectives and explicitly reconciles conflicts to produce one final recommendation.

How do I orchestrate parallel model invocations for UX and architecture tasks?

You can orchestrate parallel model invocations by routing your architecture and UX request through multiple provider CLIs simultaneously, with provider-availability fallbacks ensuring execution.

Does cross-validation with multiple models work when AI reasoning diverges?

Cross-validation handles divergent reasoning by explicitly calling out where models disagree, then selecting a final direction with structured rationale and a conflict-aware synthesis.

What are the limitations of using provider CLIs for multi-model AI orchestration?

Multi-model orchestration depends on provider CLI availability, applying fallbacks when a provider is inaccessible, but synthesis quality is constrained by the reasoning limits of the routed models.

Do I need provider CLIs to run parallel tri-model code reviews?

Yes, provider CLIs are required to run parallel tri-model code reviews, executing the task across multiple models and applying provider-availability fallbacks before synthesizing the output.