ce-devils-advocate

A devil's advocate review challenges code-change proposals by identifying hidden risks, weak evidence, and potential regressions across cleanup, test quality, and maintainability. You apply it to proposals from specific code evaluation workflows to ensure ADR-030 criteria are followed before execution.

Adversarial risk analysis stress-tests code cleanup and test proposals against evidence quality and potential behavior regressions. It surfaces high-impact risks for action by applying ADR-030 prompts, providing structured risk ratings and follow-up actions to prevent regressions.

You evaluate test pruning proposals by applying a devil's advocate review role that identifies hidden risks and coverage regressions. The process checks proposals against ADR-030 criteria and generates a risk-focused objections report with structured ratings.

Yes, you can review dead code removal suggestions by challenging the proposals for weak evidence and maintainability risks. The review applies ADR-030 prompts to surface high-impact risks and provide structured follow-up actions before execution.

Multi-option focus analysis (A/B/C) balances different risk dimensions by evaluating cleanup and test proposals across specific risk categories. This approach ensures comprehensive adversarial review by structuring risk ratings and follow-up actions for each focus area.

Adversarial review is specifically designed for pre-execution evaluation of cleanup, test pruning, dead code removal, and code quality proposals. It is not intended for standard feature development reviews or proposals outside the ADR-030 workflow scope.