ce-devils-advocate

Name: ce-devils-advocate
Availability: InStock
Author: moffran

Critique code-change proposals for hidden risks and regressions with structured ratings.

78|15|Updated May 1, 2023

Search Tags:#code-quality #proposal-evaluation #devils-advocate #adr-030 #risk-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Moffran/calibrated_explanations --skill ce-devils-advocate

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ce-devils-advocate
Source: https://github.com/Moffran/calibrated_explanations/tree/main/.claude/skills/ce-devils-advocate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Moffran/calibrated_explanations --skill ce-devils-advocate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarially challenge cleanup and test proposals for hidden risk, weak evidence, and coverage or behavior regressions, including Option A/B/C focus-specific risks.

Core Features & Use Cases

Implements a Devil's Advocate review role to stress-test proposals against risk, evidence quality, and potential regressions.
Guides reviewers to consider ADR-030 prompts and related CE workflows, surfacing high-impact risks for action.
Supports multi-option focus analysis (A/B/C) to balance different risk dimensions.

Quick Start

Activate the Devil's Advocate review on a CE proposal and generate a risk-focused objections report following ADR-030.

Frequently Asked Questions about ce-devils-advocate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform a devil's advocate review on a code cleanup proposal?▼

A devil's advocate review challenges code-change proposals by identifying hidden risks, weak evidence, and potential regressions across cleanup, test quality, and maintainability. You apply it to proposals from specific code evaluation workflows to ensure ADR-030 criteria are followed before execution.

What is adversarial risk analysis for code quality proposals?▼

Adversarial risk analysis stress-tests code cleanup and test proposals against evidence quality and potential behavior regressions. It surfaces high-impact risks for action by applying ADR-030 prompts, providing structured risk ratings and follow-up actions to prevent regressions.

How do I evaluate test pruning proposals for potential regressions?▼

You evaluate test pruning proposals by applying a devil's advocate review role that identifies hidden risks and coverage regressions. The process checks proposals against ADR-030 criteria and generates a risk-focused objections report with structured ratings.

Can I use this approach to review dead code removal suggestions?▼

Yes, you can review dead code removal suggestions by challenging the proposals for weak evidence and maintainability risks. The review applies ADR-030 prompts to surface high-impact risks and provide structured follow-up actions before execution.

What's the best way to balance different risk dimensions in code reviews?▼

Multi-option focus analysis (A/B/C) balances different risk dimensions by evaluating cleanup and test proposals across specific risk categories. This approach ensures comprehensive adversarial review by structuring risk ratings and follow-up actions for each focus area.

When should I not use adversarial review for code changes?▼

Adversarial review is specifically designed for pre-execution evaluation of cleanup, test pruning, dead code removal, and code quality proposals. It is not intended for standard feature development reviews or proposals outside the ADR-030 workflow scope.