ce-doc-review

Analyze requirements or plan documents with parallel persona agents and route findings.

Updated Sep 25, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kwam1na/athena --skill ce-doc-review-kwam1na
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ce-doc-review
Source: https://github.com/kwam1na/athena/tree/main/.agents/skills/ce-doc-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kwam1na/athena --skill ce-doc-review-kwam1na

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Complex requirement and planning documents often harbor unnoticed tensions, contradictions, or gaps when reviewed in isolation. The ce-doc-review skill coordinates parallel persona agents to surface role-specific issues, enabling faster consensus and higher-quality documentation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel analysis by multiple personas to surface risks, gaps, and ambiguities in requirements or plans
  • Interactive per-finding walk-through with a four-option routing workflow (Apply, Defer, Skip, or bulk best-judgment)
  • Automatic safe-auto fixes for mechanical issues and gated-auto/manual findings for human judgment
  • Open Questions deferral support and end-to-end synthesis, presentation, and action kickoff

Quick Start

Provide a target document path and optional mode flags to start an interactive multi-persona review.

Frequently Asked Questions about ce-doc-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review complex requirements documents for hidden contradictions and gaps?

Reviewing complex requirements documents for contradictions and gaps is handled by coordinating parallel persona agents that surface role-specific issues, classify findings, and route them through an interactive workflow for faster consensus.

What is parallel persona analysis for plan document risk assessment?

Parallel persona analysis for plan document risk assessment is a process where multiple role-specific agents simultaneously analyze a document to surface distinct risks, ambiguities, and open questions from different team perspectives.

How do I apply safe auto-fixes to mechanical issues during a doc review?

To apply safe auto-fixes during a doc review, the system automatically identifies and resolves mechanical issues, while routing gated-auto and manual findings to human judgment through a four-option routing workflow.

Can I defer open questions found in planning documents for cross-team collaboration?

Yes, you can defer open questions found in planning documents for cross-team collaboration using the built-in deferral support, which routes items for later resolution while continuing the interactive review workflow.

What is the best way to handle ambiguities in requirements documents across multiple roles?

The best way to handle ambiguities in requirements documents across multiple roles is using parallel persona agents to surface role-specific issues, followed by an interactive walk-through offering Apply, Defer, Skip, or bulk best-judgment routing for each finding.

Do I need a specific document format to start a multi-persona planning review?

To start a multi-persona planning review, you provide a target document path along with optional mode flags, which initiates the interactive analysis without requiring specialized formatting beyond accessible document paths.