ce:review

Orchestrate multi-agent code review and produce structured JSON findings.

Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jaydubya818/New_baseline --skill ce-review-jaydubya818
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ce:review
Source: https://github.com/jaydubya818/New_baseline/tree/main/skills/compound-engineering/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/ce-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jaydubya818/New_baseline --skill ce-review-jaydubya818

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Reviews code changes using dynamically selected reviewer personas. Spawns parallel sub-agents that return structured JSON, then merges and deduplicates findings into a single report.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Spawns multiple reviewer personas to inspect diffs and provide structured JSON findings.
  • Merges, deduplicates, and stages findings with confidence gating for synthesis.
  • Supports autofix-safe automation or report-only reviews within larger workflows.
  • Works for PR reviews, branch diffs, and standalone code checks.

Quick Start

Run the ce-review skill on a PR or branch to generate a structured, multi-agent code review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about ce:review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a multi-agent code review for a PR diff?

A multi-agent code review works by spawning parallel reviewer personas to inspect PR diffs and return structured JSON findings. These findings are merged, deduplicated, and staged with confidence gating to deliver a comprehensive report including risk notes and testing gaps.

Can I use automated code review for branch diffs and standalone checks?

Automated code review supports branch diffs and standalone checks alongside standard PR reviews. The workflow applies to any code changes, generating structured JSON findings with confidence metrics, risk notes, and testing gaps for comprehensive intent discovery.

Does multi-agent PR review support quality gates and autofix automation?

Multi-agent PR review supports autofix-safe automation and report-only reviews to enable automated quality gates. It produces structured JSON findings with confidence metrics, allowing you to gate code merges based on risk notes and testing gaps identified by the reviewer personas.

What is the output format for structured code review findings?

The output format for structured code review findings is JSON, containing confidence metrics, risk notes, and testing gaps. The system optionally surfaces project-standards paths for governance, merging and deduplicating results from parallel sub-agents into a single report.

How does diff analysis identify testing gaps and risk notes?

Diff analysis identifies testing gaps and risk notes by spawning dynamically selected reviewer personas to inspect code changes. These parallel sub-agents return structured JSON findings which are merged and deduplicated, applying confidence gating to highlight comprehensive intent discovery and project-standards governance.