ce-review

Orchestrate parallel specialist code reviews and merge findings into Fix-First JSON envelopes.

1|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lucasmccomb/ccgm --skill ce-review-lucasmccomb
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ce-review
Source: https://github.com/lucasmccomb/ccgm/tree/main/modules/ce-review/skills/ce-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lucasmccomb/ccgm --skill ce-review-lucasmccomb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Consolidates disparate review commands and specialist prompts into a single, structured review pipeline so teams get consistent, prioritized findings and safe automated fixes without manual orchestration.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Collects prior learnings, runs a scope-drift gate, dispatches tiered specialist reviewers in parallel, and finishes with an adversarial red-team pass.
  • Merges, deduplicates, confidence-calibrates, and routes findings into Fix-First envelopes with autofix_class routing (safe_auto, gated_auto, manual, advisory).
  • Use Case: Run a thorough multi-file PR review that applies mechanical fixes, batches taste-call questions, and produces a machine-readable run artifact for CI or downstream automation.

Quick Start

Run /ce-review on a pull request branch to produce a merged Fix-First review envelope and apply safe_auto fixes in interactive mode.

Frequently Asked Questions about ce-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I orchestrate automated code reviews across multiple files in a pull request?

To orchestrate automated code reviews across multiple files, dispatch parallel specialist reviewers for security, performance, and reliability, then merge structured findings into a unified report with confidence scoring.

What is an adversarial code review and how does it improve pull request quality?

An adversarial code review is a final red-team pass that challenges initial findings. It improves pull request quality by catching edge cases missed by standard reviews before merging structured findings.

Can I automatically apply mechanical fixes to a pull request diff?

Yes, you can automatically apply mechanical fixes by routing findings using an autofix class. Safe auto fixes apply directly, while gated auto fixes require confirmation before applying to your diff.

How do I generate a machine-readable code review report for CI pipelines?

Generate a machine-readable code review report for CI pipelines by running the review in headless or report-only mode. This produces a structured JSON envelope containing deduplicated findings and confidence scores.

Does this automated review tool work without external dependencies?

Yes, this automated review tool works without external dependencies. It operates independently to enforce confidence thresholds and route findings by autofix class across your pull requests.

What are the limitations of using confidence scoring for automated code review?

Confidence scoring limitations arise when evaluating subjective taste-call decisions. The system routes these lower-confidence findings to advisory or manual classes, preventing unsafe automated fixes in your code review.