chain-builder

Define fallback chains and retry policies for system failure modes.

Updated May 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo --skill chain-builder-aesopscott
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: chain-builder
Source: https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo/tree/main/harnesses/skills/chain-builder
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo --skill chain-builder-aesopscott

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the complexity of managing system failures by providing a structured framework to define fallback chains and retry policies, ensuring controlled recovery behavior when model paths fail.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Fallback Definition: Configure specific backup paths and degradation rules for failed model operations.
  • Retry Policy Management: Establish clear limits on retries to prevent infinite loops or resource exhaustion.
  • Use Case: When a primary AI model path fails due to a timeout or rate limit, use this Skill to define a secondary fallback path and a specific retry cap to maintain service continuity without exceeding authority boundaries.

Quick Start

Use the chain-builder skill to define a new fallback chain and retry policy for the current harness boundary.

Frequently Asked Questions about chain-builder

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I define robust fallback chains for AI model paths?

To define fallback chains, you configure specific backup paths and degradation rules for failed model operations. This ensures controlled recovery behavior when primary paths fail due to timeouts or rate limits.

What is the best way to establish retry policies to prevent infinite loops?

The best way to establish retry policies is by setting clear limits on retries within a harness-controlled environment. This prevents infinite loops and resource exhaustion during system failure recovery.

How does fallback definition work for boundary-constrained system design?

Fallback definition works by configuring specific backup paths and degradation rules for failed model operations within defined authority limits. It requires adherence to these boundaries and verification through positive and boundary testing.

Why do I need a structured framework for managing system failures and error handling?

You need a structured framework to manage the complexity of system failures, ensuring controlled recovery behavior when model paths fail. It prevents resource exhaustion by applying defined retry caps and fallback degradation rules.

Can I use this approach to maintain service continuity when a primary AI model path fails?

Yes, you can maintain service continuity by defining a secondary fallback path and a specific retry cap. This applies to reliability engineering tasks involving error handling and boundary-constrained system design.

What are the limitations of using harness-controlled environments for retry policy management?

The primary limitation is the requirement to adhere to defined authority limits within the harness boundary. You must verify behavior through positive and boundary testing to ensure the retry policies do not exceed these constraints.