chronology

The Skill builds a litigation chronology by extracting dated events from declared uploads and pleadings, applying deduplication, importance tagging, and KVKK privacy flagging to produce a sourced timeline aligned with your case theory.

The best way to track deadline risks is generating a timeline that adds notes for limitation, response, mediation, appeal, and enforcement impacts. This Skill extracts dated events and flags deadline risks without guessing trigger dates.

Yes, you can generate a KVKK-compliant chronology. The Skill flags personal data, special categories, and sensitive third-party information during document extraction, then minimizes these details in the final timeline output to maintain privacy compliance.

Duplicate merging works by identifying repeated dated events across multiple uploaded pleadings and records, combining them into single timeline entries. The Skill preserves evidentiary discipline by refusing to treat unsourced events as certain facts.

Yes, limitations are applied to unsourced facts. The Skill refuses to assert unsourced facts as certainty in the chronology, preserving evidentiary discipline by only treating events with supporting source documents as verified timeline entries.

No, litigation chronology generation requires declared source documents and uploads to extract dated events. The Skill maintains evidentiary discipline by refusing to assert unsourced facts as certainty, requiring explicit inputs for accurate timeline construction.