citation-audit

To verify references in a LaTeX manuscript, provide your paper directory to run a full citation audit against your .bib file and TeX files. It cross-checks existence, metadata, and contextual relevance, outputting a per-entry verdict and JSON ledger.

Checking your bibliography for hallucinated papers involves auditing cited entries against canonical sources like arXiv, DOIs, DBLP, and ACL Anthology. The audit performs web lookups to validate metadata accuracy and ensure cited works support surrounding claims.

Yes, you can validate arXiv IDs and DOIs in your .bib file automatically. The tool supports checks across arXiv, DBLP, ACL Anthology, and Nature/OpenReview, performing web lookups to confirm existence and metadata accuracy for every entry.

The best way to audit bibliographic integrity across multiple venues is to cross-check each citation against arXiv, DOIs, DBLP, and ACL Anthology. This process verifies existence, validates metadata, and assesses contextual appropriateness, generating a human-readable report.

Citation verification handles contextual relevance by assessing whether cited works actually support the surrounding claims in your manuscript. It cross-checks the bibliographic entry against the text to ensure the cited paper accurately backs up your statements.

A pre-submission citation audit outputs a per-entry verdict of KEEP, FIX, REPLACE, or REMOVE for each bibliographic entry. It also generates a JSON ledger and a human-readable report detailing existence, metadata accuracy, and contextual relevance.