skills.rest
mafvietnam
mafvietnamCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

ck:predict

Analyze proposed changes with five expert personas for architecture, security, performance, and UX concerns.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
Search Tags:#planning#architecture#security#code-quality#design-review#risk-analysis#mult-persona
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mafvietnam/mafapp --skill ck-predict-mafvietnam
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ck:predict
Source: https://github.com/mafvietnam/mafapp/tree/main/.claude/skills/ck-predict
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mafvietnam/mafapp --skill ck-predict-mafvietnam

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Five expert personas independently analyze proposed changes to surface architectural, security, performance, and UX concerns before coding.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent persona analyses
  • Consensus verdict before implementation
  • Actionable recommendations to guide design decisions

Quick Start

Provide a structured risk verdict for a proposed feature before implementation.

Frequently Asked Questions about ck:predict

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a design review before coding to analyze architecture and security risks?▼

A design review analyzes proposed changes using five expert personas to independently surface architecture, security, performance, and UX concerns before coding begins. It provides a structured risk verdict and actionable recommendations to guide implementation.

What is multi-persona risk analysis for software architecture overhauls?▼

Multi-persona risk analysis is a pre-implementation process where five expert personas independently assess proposed architecture overhauls to identify security and performance concerns. It generates a consensus verdict and actionable recommendations to ensure safe changes.

When do I need a pre-analysis consensus verdict for high-risk design decisions?▼

You need a pre-analysis consensus verdict when planning major features, architecture overhauls, or high-risk design decisions across software projects. It ensures independent assessments of architecture, security, performance, and UX concerns are resolved before coding begins.

Can I use structured debate to surface UX and performance concerns for major features?▼

Yes, structured debate is applied during the pre-analysis of major features to surface UX and performance concerns. Five expert personas provide independent assessments, culminating in a consensus verdict and actionable recommendations before implementation.

What is the best way to identify security and code-quality risks before implementation?▼

The best way to identify security and code-quality risks is a multi-persona pre-analysis using five expert personas. They provide independent assessments, structured debate, and a consensus verdict to deliver actionable recommendations before coding begins.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
cryborg1211cryborg1211

vc:predict

Analyze proposed changes with five personas and output a verdict.

Community
Advanced
misfitdevmisfitdev
2

hold-my-beer

Generate a 9-section execution plan with rollback steps and a GO/NO-GO verdict.

Official
Advanced
PriyanshKuniyalPriyanshKuniyal

sast-configuration

Configures and manages SAST tools for automated vulnerability detection in CI/CD pipelines.

Community
Advanced
xiaoniuge36xiaoniuge36
6

code-review

Analyze code for standards compliance, bugs, performance issues, and security vulnerabilities.

Community
Advanced