skills.rest
snake-dev-team
snake-dev-teamOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

ck:predict

Analyze proposed changes via expert debate among five personas.

Updated Apr 23, 2026
Search Tags:#software development#risk assessment#debate#change analysis#pre-commit review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/snake-dev-team/snake-backlink-forge --skill ck-predict-snake-dev-team
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ck:predict
Source: https://github.com/snake-dev-team/snake-backlink-forge/tree/main/.claude/skills/ck-predict
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/snake-dev-team/snake-backlink-forge --skill ck-predict-snake-dev-team

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps prevent issues early by having expert personas debate proposed changes before implementation, catching architectural, security, performance, and UX issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Expert Debate: Five expert personas independently analyze a proposed change.
  • Consensus Verdict: A consensus verdict is produced before code is written.
  • Use Case: Before implementing a major feature or risky change, use this Skill to catch potential issues.

Quick Start

Run the ck:predict skill with a description of the change or feature you want to analyze.

Frequently Asked Questions about ck:predict

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a pre-commit risk assessment for proposed code changes?▼

Pre-commit risk assessment involves analyzing proposed changes before implementation. This Skill uses five expert personas to independently debate the change, identifying architectural, security, performance, and UX issues early to produce a consensus verdict.

What is the best way to catch architectural and security issues before writing code?▼

To catch architectural and security issues early, use a pre-commit review process featuring expert debate. Five personas analyze your change proposal, identifying potential flaws and producing a consensus verdict before any code is actually written.

How do I analyze a risky feature proposal to prevent performance and UX issues?▼

Analyzing a risky feature proposal requires inputting the change description and optional file paths. The analysis uses an expert debate among five personas to identify performance, UX, architectural, and security issues early.

Does change analysis work without providing actual code file paths?▼

Change analysis works with just a description of the proposed change. Providing optional file paths allows the expert personas to perform deeper code analysis, but a consensus verdict can still be produced from the proposal alone.

When should I use an expert debate for software development risk assessment?▼

Use expert debate for software development risk assessment before implementing major features or risky changes. This proactive change analysis catches architectural, security, performance, and UX issues early, before you commit to writing code.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
auxi-wardrobeauxi-wardrobe
1

ck:predict

Simulate a five-persona debate to identify risks in change proposals.

Official
Advanced
Thanh-aperoThanh-apero
1

ck:predict

Simulate multi-persona debates to identify software issues before implementation.

Community
Advanced
eliottbusinesseliottbusiness

requesting-code-review

Automate pre-commit code review with static analysis and security scanning.

Community
Advanced
AvihusittonAvihusitton

brooks-lint

Review code for design smells, coupling issues, and architectural risks.

Community
Intermediate