ck:predict

Simulate multi-persona debates to identify software issues before implementation.

1|1|Updated Jan 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Thanh-apero/apero-kit-cli --skill ck-predict-thanh-apero
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ck:predict
Source: https://github.com/Thanh-apero/apero-kit-cli/tree/main/.claude/skills/ck-predict
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Thanh-apero/apero-kit-cli --skill ck-predict-thanh-apero

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The ck:predict skill helps identify potential issues early in the development process by simulating expert debate on proposed changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Expert Analysis: Simulates debate among five expert personas to uncover architectural, security, performance, and UX issues.
  • Pre-Implementation Review: Use before major features or risky changes to catch problems before they become costly.
  • Customizable: Run with a specific feature description or change proposal, and optionally include files for deeper analysis.

Quick Start

Run the 'ck:predict' skill with a feature description, e.g., 'ck:predict "Implement new user authentication flow"'

Frequently Asked Questions about ck:predict

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I do a pre-implementation risk assessment for software changes?

Pre-implementation risk assessment is done by simulating a multi-persona debate on proposed changes to identify architectural, security, performance, and UX issues before implementation.

What is the best way to detect architectural and security issues before coding?

The best way to detect architectural and security issues is running an expert debate simulation on your feature proposal, which analyzes code and documentation to output a consensus verdict with actionable recommendations.

Can I run a pre-implementation review using just a feature description?

You can run a pre-implementation review using just a feature description, and optionally include files for deeper analysis to uncover potential issues early in the development process.

How does expert debate issue detection work for software development?

Expert debate issue detection works by simulating five expert personas reviewing proposed changes, analyzing your code and documentation to identify architectural, security, performance, and UX issues.

When should I use a multi-persona debate for issue detection?

Use a multi-persona debate for issue detection before major features or risky changes to catch problems early and prevent costly mistakes in the development process.

What issues can I catch with pre-implementation debate on proposed changes?

Pre-implementation debate catches architectural, security, performance, and UX issues, outputting a consensus verdict with actionable recommendations to prevent costly mistakes.