claim-chart

Generate jurisdiction-aware patent or civil element charts with pin-cited evidence and gap detection.

Updated Dec 4, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal --skill claim-chart-polliticalsolutions
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: claim-chart
Source: https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal/tree/main/.claude/skills/litigation-legal/claim-chart
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal --skill claim-chart-polliticalsolutions

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It turns messy litigation or patent technical content into an element-by-element claim chart with pin-cites, so you can immediately see what is supported and what is missing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Patent claim charts and auditing: map asserted claim limitations against an accused product, prior art, or an opposing chart with construction-aware handling.
  • Civil element charts for proof planning: map pleaded causes of action or defenses against the evidence to surface gaps for discovery, MSJ, or trial.
  • Gap detection as the priority output: produce a needs-evidence / gap list to drive next actions rather than produce unsupported conclusions.
  • Draft-only guardrails: enforces attorney verification posture and adds disclosed-document restrictions before using litigation materials.

Quick Start

Generate a patent claim chart in infringement mode for the asserted claims against the accused product, pin-citing every cell and returning the needs-evidence gap list.

Frequently Asked Questions about claim-chart

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I create a patent claim chart with pin-cited evidence for infringement analysis?

A patent claim chart maps asserted claim limitations against an accused product or prior art with pin-cited evidentiary support. It generates a structured markdown chart, applies construction-aware handling, and prioritizes a needs-evidence gap list to drive next actions.

What is the best way to map civil elements for proof planning and discovery?

Civil element mapping aligns pleaded causes of action or defenses against available evidence to surface proof gaps. It identifies missing elements for discovery, MSJ, or trial preparation while maintaining draft-only guardrails requiring attorney verification before conclusions.

Can I use a claim chart to identify missing evidence for invalidity arguments?

Yes, an invalidity claim chart maps prior art against patent claims with pin-cited support. It highlights limitations lacking evidentiary backing and outputs a prioritized gap detection list to focus next-step prior art searches.

How does gap detection work in an element chart for litigation?

Gap detection in an element chart evaluates each mapped limitation against disclosed evidence and flags unsupported cells. It produces a needs-evidence list as the priority output, directing discovery or audit actions rather than rendering unsupported conclusions.

Are there limitations when using disclosed litigation documents for evidence mapping?

Evidence mapping enforces safe handling of disclosed-document restrictions before processing litigation materials. It applies chart-as-draft guardrails and requires attorney verification posture, meaning outputs remain draft-only and construction-dependent until professionally reviewed.

Does claim chart generation support export formats for civil proof and patent auditing?

Claim chart generation produces structured markdown alongside export formats for both patent auditing and civil proof mapping. It requires jurisdiction-aware inputs and delivers pin-cited evidentiary support with a prioritized gap list for immediate action.