Assess code changes against acceptance criteria with a two-phase review workflow.
npx skills add https://github.com/Busboom-Foo/meetupfu --skill code-review-busboom-foo
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-review Source: https://github.com/Busboom-Foo/meetupfu/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Busboom-Foo/meetupfu --skill code-review-busboom-foo
Two-phase code review reduces manual overhead by evaluating code changes for correctness against acceptance criteria and quality against coding standards, providing structured feedback rather than ad-hoc comments.
Review the latest pull request against the ticket's acceptance criteria and coding conventions to generate a Phase 1 PASS/FAIL verdict and Phase 2 findings.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Automate code review against acceptance criteria using a two-phase evaluation workflow. Phase 1 checks correctness by yielding a PASS or FAIL verdict per criterion, while Phase 2 assesses code quality and maintainability if Phase 1 passes.
A two-phase code review process splits evaluation into correctness and quality checks. Phase 1 verifies code changes against acceptance criteria with PASS or FAIL outcomes, and Phase 2 identifies severity-level issues for maintainability and security.
Verify tests for acceptance criteria during code review by applying Phase 1 traceability checks. This process ensures that tests exist for each criterion and confirm they pass before proceeding to quality assessment.
Yes, the code review workflow checks for security and architectural consistency. During Phase 2, it evaluates code quality, maintainability, security, and architectural consistency, providing actionable recommendations with severity levels.
Structure pull request feedback for engineering reviews by using a two-phase workflow. Output Phase 1 PASS or FAIL verdicts per criterion, then generate Phase 2 findings with severity levels and actionable recommendations for quality issues.
takemi-ohamaReview pull requests and return an Approve or Request Changes decision.
HeyvhuangAutomate merge-ready quality review of code changes with structured reports.
JaronTamReview test suites against best practices and generate quality reports.
robertzengcnReview code diffs, run adversarial tests, and consult on coding questions via the OpenAI Codex CLI.
