code-review

Automated code reviews evaluate architectural decisions, SOLID adherence, and performance by loading project files and validating them against coding standards. This process generates a structured report containing actionable findings and suggestions.

A SOLID principles code review checks source files for adherence to architecture decisions, coding standards, and testability. It evaluates SOLID compliance alongside performance considerations to reduce technical debt and prevent bugs.

Yes, static analysis and architectural reviews can be performed on specified files or directories. The review focuses on the targeted source folder, loading only the relevant files to validate standards and evaluate testability.

A multi-phase code review works by loading files, checking architecture decision records, validating coding standards, and evaluating SOLID principles. It automatically spawns specialist review tasks to provide focused feedback on engine and quality concerns.

Yes, coding standards documentation is required to perform an architectural code review. The review process needs read access to project files and standards documentation to validate ADR compliance and evaluate code quality accurately.

The best way to evaluate testability and performance is through a structured code review that applies SOLID principles and architecture decision records. This generates an actionable report with findings, suggestions, and a final verdict.