code-review

Parallel code reviews are coordinated by collecting diffs and evaluating them simultaneously across five perspectives: simplify, code-quality, code-security, code-performance, and code-test, followed by integrated reporting.

Integrating security checks into code review workflows is handled by executing a dedicated code-security perspective alongside other quality evaluations in parallel, ensuring security findings are consolidated into a final integrated report.

Integrated reports from multiple code review perspectives are generated by collecting diffs, running parallel evaluations across five distinct viewpoints, and consolidating the findings into a unified output that applies only approved suggestions.

Codex-based evaluations are supported as an optional feature, enabling additional meta-reviews alongside the standard parallel evaluations of code changes across the five designated perspectives.

Reviewing code changes without complex dependencies is possible because the review orchestrator operates independently, requiring no external dependencies to collect diffs and execute parallel multi-perspective evaluations.

YAML frontmatter in code review reporting provides metadata support but does not replace the core diff evaluation logic, serving only as an optional metadata layer within the integrated reporting phase.