skills.rest
cr330326
cr330326COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@RanChen724662GitHub

code-review

Review pull requests and diffs with severity-labeled findings and remediation guidance.

1|Updated Mar 18, 2026
Search Tags:#performance#security#maintainability#code-quality#code-review#review-guidelines
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cr330326/AgentSkill --skill code-review-cr330326
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/cr330326/AgentSkill/tree/main/validate/skill-generator-workspace/iteration-1/eval-2-code-review/without_skill/outputs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cr330326/AgentSkill --skill code-review-cr330326

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Guides structured code review of pull requests and diffs like a senior engineer. Covers code quality, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, style consistency, error handling, testability, and architectural concerns. Produces actionable, severity-ranked feedback with concrete fix suggestions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured, phase-driven review workflow that can be applied to PRs, diffs, or specific files.
  • Actionable feedback with concrete suggestions to improve code quality, security, and maintainability.
  • Scenarios: pre-merge reviews, post-merge audits, or mentoring teammates through reviews.

Quick Start

Provide a thorough code review of the given PR or diff, then deliver a structured feedback summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured code review on a pull request?▼

To perform a structured code review, identify the scope and intent of the patch, then evaluate correctness, security, performance, and maintainability using a consistent checklist to deliver severity-labeled findings with concrete remediation guidance.

What is the best way to provide actionable feedback during a code review?▼

Actionable feedback is generated by evaluating code quality, security vulnerabilities, and performance issues, then delivering a structured summary with severity-ranked findings and concrete fix suggestions to improve the patch.

Can I review code for security vulnerabilities and performance issues together?▼

Yes, you can review code for security vulnerabilities and performance issues together by following a phase-driven workflow that assesses correctness, security, performance, and maintainability simultaneously.

How do I check code quality and maintainability before merging a pull request?▼

You check code quality and maintainability by applying a consistent checklist to the diff that covers error handling, testability, and architectural concerns, yielding a structured feedback summary before merging.

Does this code review approach work for post-merge audits and mentoring teammates?▼

Yes, this code review approach works for post-merge audits and mentoring teammates by applying a phase-driven review workflow to PRs, diffs, or specific files to generate actionable, severity-ranked feedback.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
J-PsterJ-Pster
291

requesting-code-review

Generate standardized code-review requests with severity-labeled findings.

Community
Intermediate
mahg-esmahg-es
3

secure-code

Review source code for security vulnerabilities with CWE mappings and concrete fixes.

Official
Advanced
gkganesh12gkganesh12
1

gk-review

Audit source code against documentation and test suites for architectural drift.

Community
Advanced
winsorllcwinsorllc

code-reviewer

Analyze code files or directories and generate CODE_REVIEW.md reports.

Community
Intermediate