code-review

Coordinate parallel code reviews across architecture, quality, security, and maintainability.

3|7|Updated Nov 7, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dimagi/dimagi-claude-workflows --skill code-review-dimagi
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/dimagi/dimagi-claude-workflows/tree/main/plugins/code-review/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dimagi/dimagi-claude-workflows --skill code-review-dimagi

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Coordinate a comprehensive, multi-dimension code review for code changes or pull requests.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel reviewer orchestration: spawn five specialized reviewers to cover architecture, quality, smells, security, and maintainability.
  • Structured findings and synthesis: combine results into a prioritized, coherent review.
  • Triage-style output: summarize risks and actionable improvements for stakeholders.

Quick Start

Provide a thorough, senior-engineer-quality code review of the provided codebase, leveraging 5 parallel reviewer dimensions.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get a comprehensive code review for a pull request?

A comprehensive code review coordinates five parallel reviewers to analyze architecture, quality, smells, security, and maintainability. By providing a pull request diff or repository, you receive a structured, prioritized triage summary of risks and actionable improvements.

Can I use automated code review on existing repositories across different programming languages?

Automated code review applies to code diffs, files, or entire repositories across various languages and frameworks. It orchestrates multi-dimension analysis to deliver a senior-level quality assessment and a triage-style summary of actionable improvements regardless of the tech stack.

What is the best way to assess code quality and security vulnerabilities in a diff?

The best way to assess code quality and security is through parallel reviewer orchestration that evaluates architecture, smells, and security simultaneously. This synthesizes structured findings into a single, prioritized triage summary of risks and actionable improvements.

How does parallel processing work for multi-dimension code reviews?

Parallel processing in code review works by spawning five specialized reviewers to cover distinct dimensions like architecture and maintainability. It combines their per-dimension analysis outputs into a coherent, prioritized final triage summary for stakeholders.

When do I need a senior-level triage summary for code changes?

You need a senior-level triage summary when a comprehensive review of code changes is requested for stakeholders. It combines multi-dimension analysis into a prioritized assessment of risks and actionable improvements to guide decision-making.