Review game code files for architecture, SOLID, and standards compliance.
npx skills add https://github.com/emcconnell/nova-scout --skill code-review-emcconnell
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-review Source: https://github.com/emcconnell/nova-scout/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/emcconnell/nova-scout --skill code-review-emcconnell
Provides a repeatable, thorough review process that identifies architectural violations, standards drift, maintainability regressions, and testability or performance issues across a codebase so teams can ship safer, more maintainable game systems.
Run the code-review skill against the path to your file or directory to receive a structured architectural and standards review with prioritized fixes.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
An architectural code review evaluates scene and module boundaries, cross-module dependencies, SOLID principles, and delta-time usage. It loads target files to identify structural violations, standards drift, and maintainability regressions across engine, gameplay, UI, and shader files.
ADR compliance verification searches for Architecture Decision Records, extracts decisions, and classifies any deviations as violations, drift, or minor deviations. This ensures code changes align with established architectural standards before merging.
Yes, automated code reviews apply to game development codebases including Godot engine, gameplay, UI, and shader files. The review checks dependency direction, circular dependencies, hot-path allocations, and resource cleanup specific to game systems.
Checking SOLID principles and testability involves evaluating dependency direction, circular dependencies, and whether acceptance criteria are testable. The review produces actionable Required Changes and Suggestions to improve maintainability and performance.
Specialist orchestration spawns language, shader, UI, and QA specialist reviews in parallel when configured. It aggregates their findings into a structured verdict, providing comprehensive coverage across different technical domains.
Run code reviews during pull requests, story reviews, and QA handoffs. This timing catches architectural regressions early, ensures acceptance criteria remain testable, and produces prioritized fixes before code reaches production.
wsmanReview implementation files for architectural, ADR, SOLID, and domain-specific defects.
WindXRanReview specified files for architecture, quality, and ADR compliance.
vm0-aiCodify vm0 architectural and code-quality principles for reviews and onboarding.
trypanicRun go vet, staticcheck, and semgrep to generate severity-grouped fix plans.
