code-review

A structured code review evaluates architectural weaknesses by applying a checklist covering design-pattern usage, SOLID principles, layer separation, error handling, and data access. This process produces an architecture report with actionable improvement suggestions for the target module.

An architecture review evaluates SOLID adherence, design-pattern usage, proper layer separation, error handling, and maintainable data access. It systematically articulates architectural weaknesses and opportunities to guide software decisions and reduce architectural debt.

To generate an architecture review report, apply the review checklist to the new feature's codebase. The evaluation covers architecture layers, dependencies, and SOLID principles, resulting in a structured report with actionable improvement suggestions.

Yes, you can apply this architecture review approach to new features, modules, or systems across software projects. It guides architectural decisions by enforcing criteria like design-pattern usage and proper layer separation regardless of the specific project context.

The best way to identify architectural debt is through objective code-architecture evaluations. By systematically checking design patterns, SOLID adherence, and dependency management, teams can articulate design flaws and reduce accumulated architectural debt.

You need an architecture review when evaluating new features or systems for design flaws and architectural debt. Unlike standard code reviews, it enforces criteria such as proper layer separation, SOLID principles, and design-pattern usage to guide high-level architectural decisions.