skills.rest
GiantCroissant-Lunar
GiantCroissant-LunarOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

code-review

Identify architecture compliance gaps and contract stability issues in C#/.NET code reviews.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#vocabulary#ADR#RFC#code-review#contract-stability#truth-boundaries
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GiantCroissant-Lunar/fantasim-world --skill code-review-giantcroissant-lunar
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/GiantCroissant-Lunar/fantasim-world/tree/main/.agent/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GiantCroissant-Lunar/fantasim-world --skill code-review-giantcroissant-lunar

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The code-review skill identifies architecture compliance gaps and contract stability issues during review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Spec alignment checks against RFCs and ADR decisions.
  • Vocabulary separation enforcement between Governance and Pipeline axes.
  • Truth boundary validation to prevent derived data from influencing core topology.
  • Contract stability checks for immutable IDs and backward-compatible schemas.
  • Checklist-based review applicable to PR reviews, pre-commit checks, and audits.

Quick Start

Use the code-review skill during pull requests and self-reviews to enforce architectural integrity and contract stability. Apply the structured checklist, document findings, and link RFC/ADR references to support decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check architecture compliance during a code review?▼

To check architecture compliance during a code review, apply a structured checklist to enforce spec alignment, vocabulary separation, and truth boundaries against your RFCs and ADRs.

What is truth boundary validation in C#/.NET projects?▼

Truth boundary validation in C#/.NET projects prevents derived data from influencing core topology, ensuring persistence-related checks maintain architectural integrity during pull request reviews.

Can I use a checklist-based review for pre-commit self-reviews?▼

Yes, you can use checklist-based reviews for pre-commit self-reviews to enforce architectural integrity, verify contract stability, and document findings with linked RFC and ADR references.

Does this code review skill support contract stability checks for immutable IDs?▼

Yes, this code review skill supports contract stability checks by validating immutable IDs and ensuring backward-compatible schemas are maintained across your C#/.NET codebase audits.

How do I enforce vocabulary separation between Governance and Pipeline axes?▼

Enforce vocabulary separation between Governance and Pipeline axes by applying the structured review checklist during pull requests to identify architectural compliance gaps and ensure proper domain separation.

What is the best way to align code with ADR decisions?▼

The best way to align code with ADR decisions is applying a structured review checklist that validates spec alignment, contract stability, and architectural integrity during audits.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
rickardprickardp
2

blueprint:validate

Audit codebases for spec, ADR, and pattern compliance with a structured report.

Community
Advanced
epieczkoepieczko

api.validate

Validate OpenAPI 3.x and AsyncAPI 3.x specifications against Zalando guidelines.

Community
Intermediate
BerryKuipersBerryKuipers
7

commit-with-validation

Create atomic Git commits with standardized messages and pre-commit validation.

Community
Intermediate
OneWave-AIOneWave-AI
245

code-review-pro

Review code for security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and maintainability issues.

Official
Basic