code-review

Review pull requests for correctness, security, and maintainability issues.

Updated Apr 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lgili/skillex --skill code-review-lgili
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/lgili/skillex/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lgili/skillex --skill code-review-lgili

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systematic code reviews to identify correctness, security, and maintainability issues in pull requests across languages and frameworks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured critique across design, tests, and architecture decisions.
  • Actionable feedback with clear blockers, suggestions, and nit-level notes.
  • Reference-guided checks including security and quality guidelines.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to perform a thorough code review.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured code review on a pull request?

Perform a structured code review by applying a checklist-driven workflow to identify correctness, security, and maintainability issues. This approach provides actionable feedback across design, tests, and architecture decisions in pull requests.

What is the best way to categorize feedback during a pull request review?

Categorize pull request review feedback using distinct blockers, suggestions, and nit levels. This severity classification helps developers prioritize structural fixes, actionable improvements, and minor stylistic notes separately.

Can I use this code review process across different programming languages and frameworks?

Yes, this code review process applies to pull requests across multiple languages and frameworks. It evaluates architecture decisions and potential security concerns universally, rather than relying on language-specific linting rules.

Does this code review approach include security and best-practice checklists?

Yes, the code review process includes reference-guided security and best-practice checklists. These references ensure systematic checks against established quality guidelines and provide a clear escalation path for identified vulnerabilities.

What limitations should I expect from a checklist-driven code review?

A checklist-driven code review focuses on structural correctness, security, and maintainability issues rather than runtime execution behavior. It provides actionable suggestions and an escalation path but does not execute the code to detect runtime errors.