skills.rest
Nathanto-ai
Nathanto-aiCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

code-review

Automate structured code reviews with multi-mode assessment and hierarchical checklists.

Updated Mar 5, 2026
Search Tags:#static-analysis#quality-assurance#code-review#risk-mitigation#pull-requests#review-guidelines#team-process
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Nathanto-ai/liza-private --skill code-review-nathanto-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/Nathanto-ai/liza-private/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Nathanto-ai/liza-private --skill code-review-nathanto-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code-review workflow standardization, enabling consistent quality checks and clear accountability across teams.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-mode review (Sanity, Standard, Deep) to match risk and time constraints.
  • Hierarchical checklists covering security, correctness, architecture, data integrity, and maintainability.
  • Markdown-based guidance document loaded into context to guide reviewers during activation.

Quick Start

Review the latest changes using the Standard mode and the built-in checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize code reviews across multiple pull requests?▼

Standardize code reviews by enforcing a formal, multi-mode assessment across pull requests to achieve consistent quality checks and clear accountability across your software engineering team.

What is the best way to structure a security check for a pull request diff?▼

Structure a pull request security check by applying a hierarchical checklist that prioritizes security, correctness, architecture, data integrity, and maintainability to systematically validate code changes.

How do I conduct an architecture validation review during a code review?▼

Conduct architecture validation by selecting a review posture like Sanity, Standard, or Deep, and applying the built-in Markdown-based guidance document to assess architectural risks within the diff.

Can I use a structured checklist for different risk levels in static analysis?▼

Yes, you can match risk and time constraints using multi-mode review postures—Sanity, Standard, and Deep—each applying hierarchical static analysis checklists to appropriately scope the assessment.

Does this code review approach work without external static analysis dependencies?▼

Yes, this code review approach operates without external dependencies, loading a Markdown-based guidance document directly into context to drive structured quality assurance and risk mitigation.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
dynatrace-ossdynatrace-oss
10

pr-reviewer

Review pull request diffs and comments to generate a structured review brief.

Official
Intermediate
CODE-SAURABHCODE-SAURABH
2

land-and-deploy

Merge approved pull requests and verify production health after deployment.

Community
Advanced
prof-danielcprof-danielc

speckit.checker

Run static analysis tools and aggregate results into a prioritized issue report.

Community
Advanced
dsidlodsidlo
2

dt-reviewer

Automate code reviews, security audits, and optimization analysis on software artifacts.

Community
Advanced