skills.rest
t0lab
t0labOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

code-review

Automate code-review workflows with structured checklists before commits and PRs.

2|Updated Apr 10, 2026
Search Tags:#git#feedback#best-practices#quality-assurance#code-review#pr-review#self-review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/t0lab/harness-kit --skill code-review-t0lab
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/t0lab/harness-kit/tree/main/.agents/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/t0lab/harness-kit --skill code-review-t0lab

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Proactive, standardized code-review protocols that ensure quality before commits, reduce review friction, and improve response to feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Self-Review Checks: A before-commit checklist that guards correctness, tests, and readability.
  • PR Review Protocols: Structured evaluation of diffs from others to catch issues early.
  • Receiving Review Guidance: Clear steps for responding to feedback to close reviews quickly and with quality.
  • Policy Integration: Works with existing git workflows and team standards.

Quick Start

Run the self-review checklist before you commit or open a PR.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a code review checklist before opening a PR?▼

You can automate a code review checklist by applying structured self-review protocols before commits or pushes. This evaluates diffs across correctness, tests, security, design, naming, side effects, and diff size to enforce safe, consistent reviews.

What is the best way to structure PR review feedback for a git diff?▼

Structuring PR review feedback requires applying a standardized checklist across correctness, tests, security, design, naming, side effects, and diff size. This protocol guides teams through structured checks to evaluate peer diffs and catch issues early.

How do I respond to code review comments effectively?▼

Responding to code review comments effectively involves following clear receiving review guidance steps. This structured approach to feedback response works with existing git workflows and team standards to help close reviews quickly and with quality.

Can I use this code review workflow with existing git policies and team standards?▼

Yes, this code review workflow integrates with existing git policies and team standards. It works seamlessly with your current workflows to enforce best practices across self-review checks, peer diff evaluations, and feedback response protocols.

What specific checks should a pre-commit self-review cover?▼

A pre-commit self-review should cover specific checks for correctness, tests, security, design, naming and readability, side effects, and diff size. This rigorous checklist guards against issues before commits to ensure comprehensive quality assurance.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
ss49919201ss49919201

git-add-commit

Stage git changes and generate commit messages from diffs.

Community
Basic
lailtonjuniorlailtonjunior

Pr Review

Automate pull request reviews to enforce team standards and best practices across Git workflows.

Community
Intermediate
zeronx798zeronx798

requesting-code-review

Scan staged git changes for security issues and quality regressions.

Community
Advanced
nth5693nth5693
370

code-review

Automate multi-perspective code reviews with structured checklists and workflow prompts.

Community
Basic