code-review

Analyze source files for bugs, antipatterns, and quality issues.

16|3|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/YehudaFrankel/clankbrain --skill code-review-yehudafrankel
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/YehudaFrankel/clankbrain/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/YehudaFrankel/clankbrain --skill code-review-yehudafrankel

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews are time-consuming and prone to missing issues. This Skill provides a structured, repeatable checklist to detect bugs, antipatterns, and quality gaps in a target file, improving consistency and code health.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured findings: reports issues with File, Line, Issue, and Severity in a tabular format.
  • Broad coverage: checks backend APIs, frontend code, and general coding patterns for common pitfalls.
  • Use cases: suitable for pre-commit checks, PR reviews, and quality audits to guide fixes and improvements.

Quick Start

Describe the file you want reviewed and I will generate a structured report of issues and suggested fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I spot bugs and antipatterns in a source file?

To spot bugs and antipatterns in a source file, you can use a code review tool that analyzes the file and generates a structured findings table with issues, line numbers, and severity levels.

Can I use static analysis for a pre-commit check on frontend and backend code?

Yes, static analysis can be used for pre-commit checks on both frontend and backend codebases, identifying common pitfalls and quality gaps before changes are committed.

What is the best way to generate a structured report for a PR review?

The best way to generate a structured report for a PR review is to analyze the target file, producing a table that lists the file, line, issue, and severity of each detected bug or antipattern.

Does this code review approach work for single-file audits or entire repositories?

This code review approach works specifically for single-file audits, analyzing individual source files rather than entire repositories, making it suitable for focused design audits.

How do I fix the quality issues found during a code review?

After a code review identifies quality issues, you can address them by prompting the tool to fix the detected issues immediately or flagging them for later resolution.