code-reviewer

Compare completed code against planning documents and coding standards.

Updated Apr 16, 2014
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/minhhh/dotfiles --skill code-reviewer-minhhh
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/minhhh/dotfiles/tree/main/ai/.ai/gemini-superpowers/skills/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/minhhh/dotfiles --skill code-reviewer-minhhh

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams verify that completed project steps conform to the original plan, architecture, and coding standards, identifying deviations early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Plan Alignment Analysis: Compare the implementation against the original planning documents and step descriptions to ensure fidelity.
  • Code Quality Assessment: Review for proper patterns, error handling, naming, tests, and maintainability.
  • Architecture & Design Review: Check adherence to SOLID principles, separation of concerns, and integration readiness.
  • Documentation & Standards: Ensure headers, comments, and documentation accompany the code.
  • Actionable Feedback: Produce categorized issues (Critical/Important/Suggestions) with concrete remediation guidance.

Quick Start

Initiate a code-review of the latest completed feature against the original plan and coding standards.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate completed code against the original architecture and planning document?

To validate completed code against the original architecture and planning document, compare the implementation to initial step descriptions to ensure alignment. This plan alignment analysis identifies deviations early, verifying project fidelity before integration.

What is the best way to review code for SOLID principles and separation of concerns?

Reviewing code for SOLID principles and separation of concerns involves an architecture and design review checking adherence to structural patterns. This assesses integration readiness and ensures the implementation aligns with the planned design.

How do I generate a structured code review report with categorized issues and remediation guidance?

Generating a structured code review report involves assessing completed work against coding standards and categorizing identified issues. The report classifies findings as Critical, Important, or Suggestions, providing concrete remediation guidance for each problem.

Does code quality assessment check for error handling, naming conventions, and documentation?

Yes, code quality assessment checks for error handling, naming conventions, and documentation. It reviews proper patterns, tests, and maintainability while ensuring headers and comments accompany the completed code implementation.

When do I need a plan alignment analysis for my software project?

You need a plan alignment analysis for major project steps across architecture, design, and implementation. It determines alignment and risk by identifying deviations from the original planning document in completed code early.