coder-rules

Enforce plan-driven coding governance for multi-part implementation workflows.

47|2|Updated Feb 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hex0xdeadbeef/claude-kit --skill coder-rules
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: coder-rules
Source: https://github.com/hex0xdeadbeef/claude-kit/tree/main/.claude/skills/coder-rules
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hex0xdeadbeef/claude-kit --skill coder-rules

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coders often start implementations without a clear plan or evaluation criteria, which leads to scope creep and inconsistent handoffs. This skill provides a structured, plan-driven governance model that enforces a fixed sequence: load plan, evaluate feasibility, implement changes, verify, and deliver a handoff payload with documented resolutions and deviations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 5 CRITICAL rules: plan-only, layer-dependency checks, domain cleanliness, no log+return, and tests passing as gating conditions.
  • Evaluate Protocol: decide PROCEED / REVISE / RETURN before implementation, guiding risk assessment and plan alignment.
  • SPEC and handoff guidance: robust verification and structured handoff payloads to code-reviewers across iterations.
  • Deviation management: track push-backs and deviations from plan to preserve scope and accountability.

Quick Start

Kick off a coder workflow with the plan, evaluating feasibility, implementing changes, verifying results, and preparing the handoff payload.

Frequently Asked Questions about coder-rules

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce a plan-driven coding workflow to prevent scope creep?

A plan-driven coding workflow prevents scope creep by enforcing a fixed sequence: load the plan, evaluate feasibility, implement changes, verify results, and deliver a structured handoff payload. This ensures strict adherence to defined rules and tracks deviations to preserve accountability.

What is the evaluate protocol before starting a code implementation?

The evaluate protocol decides whether to PROCEED, REVISE, or RETURN before implementation begins. This risk assessment step checks plan alignment and feasibility to ensure the coding task stays within scope before any changes are made.

How do I prepare a structured handoff payload for code reviewers across iterations?

A structured handoff payload for code reviewers includes documented resolutions and tracked deviations from the original plan. This structured handoff protocol preserves scope and accountability across multi-part coding iterations.

What are the critical rules for reliable implementation in multi-part coding tasks?

The critical rules for reliable implementation include plan-only execution, layer-dependency checks, domain cleanliness, no log+return patterns, and requiring tests to pass as gating conditions before proceeding with the workflow.

Can I use deviation tracking to manage push-backs during a coding workflow?

Yes, deviation tracking manages push-backs by documenting any departures from the original plan. This preserves scope and accountability by ensuring all deviations are recorded and reviewed during the handoff to code reviewers.

When should I not use a plan-driven governance model for coding tasks?

You should avoid plan-driven governance for simple, single-step coding modifications that do not require multi-part iterations, structured handoffs, or feasibility evaluations, as the overhead of deviation tracking and verification gating outweighs the benefits.