story-done

Verify development story completion against acceptance criteria and governance artifacts.

18|5|Updated Nov 25, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wsman/MY-DOGE-MICRO --skill story-done-wsman
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: story-done
Source: https://github.com/wsman/MY-DOGE-MICRO/tree/main/.agents/skills/story-done
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wsman/MY-DOGE-MICRO --skill story-done-wsman

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill removes the uncertainty from ending a development story by checking that the work actually matches the acceptance criteria, governance rules, and implementation evidence before anything is marked complete.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Acceptance Criterion Verification: Reviews each criterion against the code, tests, and project artifacts so completion is based on evidence rather than assumptions.
  • Deviations and Coverage Checks: Flags CDD, ADR, manifest, scope, and test-coverage gaps so risks are visible before closure.
  • Completion Workflow Support: Updates story status, records completion notes, surfaces the next ready story, and preserves sprint and session state for team continuity.

Quick Start

Use the story-done skill to review the specified story file and determine whether it is ready to be marked Complete.

Frequently Asked Questions about story-done

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify acceptance criteria before closing a development story?

Verifying acceptance criteria before story closure requires reviewing implementation evidence, test coverage, and code reviews against project artifacts. This validation process ensures completion status is determined by concrete evidence rather than assumptions before marking work as done.

What is the best way to check for ADR compliance during a sprint workflow story review?

ADR compliance during story review is checked by comparing completed development work against architecture records and manifests. This process flags governance deviations, scope gaps, and test coverage issues so risks remain visible before finalizing story completion status.

How do I perform an end-of-story QA validation for test coverage and code reviews?

End-of-story QA validation involves assessing test coverage evidence, prompting code reviews, and checking implementation against governance rules. This workflow validates that completed code meets acceptance criteria and project artifacts before safely closing the story.

What artifacts do I need to validate development story completion status accurately?

Validating development story completion requires a story file alongside architecture, ADR, sprint, and session artifacts. These inputs enable the review process to check implementation evidence, verify acceptance criteria, and update completion status based on concrete project data.

Can I surface the next ready story automatically after closing a development story?

Surfacing the next ready story after closure is supported through completion workflow features that update story status and preserve sprint and session state. This workflow records completion notes and maintains team continuity by identifying subsequent ready stories.

Why does story closure fail when implementation evidence does not match acceptance criteria?

Story closure fails when implementation evidence does not match acceptance criteria because the validation process detects coverage gaps, scope deviations, and missing governance compliance. These checks prevent premature completion status updates by surfacing risks before final closure.