codexkit-contract-intake-router

Normalize contract requests from email or chat into structured intake data.

21|12|Updated Mar 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hoavdc/CodexKit --skill codexkit-contract-intake-router
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codexkit-contract-intake-router
Source: https://github.com/hoavdc/CodexKit/tree/main/skills/codexkit-contract-intake-router
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hoavdc/CodexKit --skill codexkit-contract-intake-router

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Clean up contract intake so legal review starts with the right information, reducing back-and-forth and speeding approvals.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Normalize each incoming request into structured fields: request type, urgency, and owner.
  • Flag missing information like counterparty, deadline, or document context to ensure completeness.
  • Separate routine routing from escalation items and group requests by review lane for faster triage.
  • Produce outputs including an intake queue, missing-information list, suggested routing lane, and escalation candidates.
  • Use cases: legal ops triage inbound contract requests from email or chat and prepare them for quick routing and action.

Quick Start

Ingest incoming contract requests and output a structured intake queue with missing information and routing suggestions.

Frequently Asked Questions about codexkit-contract-intake-router

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize contract intake for legal ops routing?

Contract intake standardization automates normalization of incoming requests into structured fields like request type, urgency, and owner to produce an intake queue and suggested routing lanes.

What is the best way to triage contract requests arriving by email or chat with inconsistent detail?

Triage inconsistent contract requests by normalizing them into structured intake data, flagging missing information like counterparty or deadline, and separating routine routing from escalation candidates.

How does automated contract intake flag missing information for follow-up?

Automated contract intake flags missing information by checking incomplete records for missing counterparty, deadline, or document context, and generating a missing-information list for follow-up.

Can I use automated intake routing to separate routine contract reviews from escalations?

Yes, automated intake routing separates routine contract reviews from escalation items, grouping requests by review lane to help legal ops triage inbound requests faster.

What outputs can I expect from automating legal contract intake?

Automating legal contract intake produces an intake queue, missing-information list, suggested routing lane, and escalation candidates to prepare requests for quick routing and action.