What problem does it solve?
This Skill helps hiring teams review Codility submissions for a Legal Document Management API task using a consistent two-pass rubric. It reduces subjective judgment by separating authorship authenticity concerns from actual level calibration, so reviewers can make clearer advance, reject, or second-review decisions.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Two-pass evaluation: First checks whether the code, transcript, and claimed skills align authentically, then grades engineering level only if the authenticity gate clears.
- Evidence-based scoring: Requires concrete support such as file-and-line references, transcript quotes, resume excerpts, and Codility timeline events for every scored row.
- Hiring recommendation support: Produces a structured recommendation against the target level and can draft a recruiter-facing Slack reply when the submission should be passed on or escalated.
- Use case: Review a candidate submission that includes solution files, a Cody transcript, verify history, and resume claims to determine whether the work appears authentic and whether the candidate fits L3, L4, or L5 expectations.
Quick Start
Ask the codility-review skill to assess a candidate's Codility submission using the target level, claimed skills, verify timeline, Cody transcript, and submitted Python files.
