reviewer-agent

Review bounded work for correctness and output evidence-linked findings with a disposition.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server --skill reviewer-agent-harkers
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reviewer-agent
Source: https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server/tree/main/skills/reviewer-agent
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server --skill reviewer-agent-harkers

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables a structured, independent read-only review of bounded work, ensuring findings are tied to concrete evidence and accompanied by a clear disposition recommendation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Read-only assessment of correctness gaps without becoming the implementer.
  • Tie findings to specific evidence and relevant files or behaviors.
  • Produce a concrete disposition: accept, revise, reject, or escalate for timely action.

Quick Start

Provide the artifact to be reviewed and request an independent, evidence-based assessment with a recommended disposition.

Frequently Asked Questions about reviewer-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an independent code review with evidence-backed findings?

An independent code review with evidence-backed findings assesses bounded work in read-only mode, tying correctness gaps to specific files or behaviors to produce a structured list of findings with severities and evidence references.

What is an evidence-based review disposition and when is it needed?

An evidence-based review disposition is a recommendation to accept, revise, reject, or escalate work after implementation, documentation, deployment, or investigations when an independent assessment pass is required for correctness.

How do I get a structured severity list for my code review findings?

To get a structured severity list for code review findings, provide the completed artifact for a read-only assessment that ties each finding to concrete evidence and outputs an acceptance recommendation.

Can I use a read-only review process without modifying the implementation?

Yes, a read-only review process assesses correctness gaps without becoming the implementer, ensuring the review remains independent and only outputs findings tied to evidence with a disposition recommendation.

Does an independent review pass work for post-deployment and investigation artifacts?

Yes, an independent review pass works for post-deployment and investigation artifacts, applying a read-only assessment to determine an accept, revise, reject, or escalate disposition based on evidence.

What is the best way to audit bounded work for correctness gaps?

The best way to audit bounded work for correctness gaps is an independent, read-only review that ties findings to concrete evidence and produces a clear disposition recommendation for timely action.