zoo-plan-review

Review Zoo Workflow specs and active-subtask plans for correctness and completeness.

5|1|Updated Aug 22, 2025

Search Tags:#planning #review #spec #quality-assurance #plan-review #zoo

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/andreyvit/zoo --skill zoo-plan-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: zoo-plan-review
Source: https://github.com/andreyvit/zoo/tree/main/.codex/skills/zoo-plan-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/andreyvit/zoo --skill zoo-plan-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides rigorous, structured reviews of Zoo Workflow specs and active-subtask plans to ensure they are correct, complete, and actionable before coding begins.

Core Features & Use Cases

Adversarial, evidence-backed plan critique that identifies gaps, ambiguities, and missing acceptance criteria.
Cross-checks alignment with Zoo contracts, design patterns, and product goals, with actionable revision notes.
Use Case: when a new Zoo workflow is proposed, run this review to surface risks and ensure testability and traceability.

Quick Start

Submit the Zoo spec and the relevant .zoo files to receive a structured critique and concrete revision suggestions.

Frequently Asked Questions about zoo-plan-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review a Zoo Workflow spec for correctness and completeness?▼

To review a Zoo Workflow spec, submit your Zoo spec and relevant .zoo files to receive structured critiques. The review cross-checks alignment with Zoo contracts, design patterns, and product goals, providing actionable revision notes.

What is a Zoo plan review and when do I need it?▼

A Zoo plan review is a rigorous, evidence-backed critique of Zoo Workflow specs and active-subtask plans. You need this review when a new Zoo workflow is proposed, to surface risks, ensure testability, and verify traceability before coding begins.

Can I use plan review to check active-subtask implementation plans in Zoo?▼

Yes, you can use plan review to check active-subtask implementation plans in Zoo. The review evaluates .zoo/planning.md and .zoo/planreview.md artifacts, identifying gaps, ambiguities, and missing acceptance criteria across planning, design, tests, and browser flow.

What's the best way to find missing acceptance criteria in a Zoo planning artifact?▼

The best way to find missing acceptance criteria is through adversarial, evidence-backed plan critique. Submitting your .zoo files generates structured feedback with identified gaps and recommended changes, ensuring actionable and testable plans.

Do I need specific .zoo files to run a plan review?▼

Yes, you need specific .zoo files to run a plan review. Submitting the Zoo spec alongside .zoo/planning.md and .zoo/planreview.md files is required to receive structured critique and concrete revision suggestions aligned with the Zoo product contract.

Why does my Zoo workflow plan lack traceable decisions?▼

Your Zoo workflow plan lacks traceable decisions because it has not undergone a structured plan review. Running this review evaluates your planning artifacts for evidence and clarity, providing structured feedback with traceable decisions that align with the Zoo product contract.