coding-worker-agent

Executes one bounded coding task at a time with validation evidence.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server --skill coding-worker-agent
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: coding-worker-agent
Source: https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server/tree/main/skills/coding-worker-agent
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/harkers/forge-email-server --skill coding-worker-agent

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Executes one bounded coding task at a time with evidence-first completion to ensure verifiable results.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces strict scope discipline to prevent scope creep during coding tasks.
  • Produces truthful completion evidence including touched files, artifacts, and validation results.
  • Highlights missing validation and open risks before handoff.

Quick Start

Define a bounded coding task and request evidence-first completion to verify results.

Frequently Asked Questions about coding-worker-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I execute a bounded coding task with evidence-first completion?

To execute a bounded coding task with evidence-first completion, define a task with explicit scope and request completion that includes touched files, artifacts, and validation results. This enforces strict scope discipline and produces traceable artifacts before acceptance.

What is evidence-first completion for coding and refactor tasks?

Evidence-first completion for coding and refactor tasks is a verification mechanism that requires truthful progress reporting. It highlights missing validation and open risks before handoff, ensuring all touched files and artifacts are traceable and validated.

How do I prevent scope creep during coding, fixes, and refactoring?

To prevent scope creep during coding, fixes, and refactoring, apply strict scope discipline by executing one bounded task at a time. This ensures the implementation stays within explicit boundaries and satisfies requirements for clear scope.

Can I use this approach for wiring and implementation tasks requiring validation?

Yes, you can use this approach for wiring and implementation tasks requiring validation. It applies to any coding task where the scope is explicit and verification is required before acceptance, producing validation evidence and highlighting open risks.

What are the limitations of bounded coding tasks for complex refactors?

Bounded coding tasks for complex refactors are limited to one task at a time with explicit scope. If validation is missing, the mechanism highlights open risks before handoff rather than auto-resolving them, requiring manual intervention for acceptance.

Why does my coding task require traceable artifacts before acceptance?

Your coding task requires traceable artifacts before acceptance to ensure truthful progress reporting. This evidence-first approach validates touched files and changes, preventing unverified implementations from passing without explicit validation results.