cognitive-rhythm-writing

Designs pacing in Japanese expository prose through cognitive-mode switching and tension management.

2|1|Updated May 11, 2019
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/guitarrapc/dotfiles-win --skill cognitive-rhythm-writing-guitarrapc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cognitive-rhythm-writing
Source: https://github.com/guitarrapc/dotfiles-win/tree/main/HOME/.agents/skills/cognitive-rhythm-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/guitarrapc/dotfiles-win --skill cognitive-rhythm-writing-guitarrapc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Dense, information-rich Japanese writing often reads as flat and boring because every paragraph is written in the same cognitive mode. This Skill treats pacing not as decoration but as deliberate switching of the reader's cognitive modes (observation, hesitation, assertion, re-observation) and as management of unresolved tension, so explanatory articles and chapters keep readers moving forward. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Rhythm design rules: Defines sentence-level beats (short setup, long flow, short stop), paragraph density waveforms, section openings via counter-questions or confessions, and landing techniques for enumerations. - Tension ledger and junk-sentence detection: Distinguishes productive looseness (sentences that update the situation) from filler (sentences that only narrate the document itself), with explicit deletion and rewriting procedures. - Mechanical post-writing checklist: Provides a five-step inspection covering topic tests, vocabulary leakage tests, tension recovery tracking, beat checks, and boundary checks. - Use Case: When a technical article or chapter is accurate but dull, apply the diagnostic table to map symptoms (uniform tone, cold theory sections, preachy endings) to concrete fixes. ## Quick Start Use the cognitive-rhythm-writing skill to diagnose and revise this Japanese explanatory article so it has pacing and unresolved tension.

Frequently Asked Questions about cognitive-rhythm-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make dense Japanese explanatory writing less boring?

Flatness comes from writing everything in one cognitive mode, not from information volume. Alternate observation, hesitation, assertion, and re-observation, and keep at least one unresolved question or unverified belief open so readers always have a reason to continue.

How to create rhythm in Japanese prose without shortening sentences?

Build rhythm with the beat pattern of short setup, long flow, short stop rather than cutting context. Removing necessary shared context to make sentences short creates gaps, not pacing; density edits should only happen after context is established.

What is the difference between productive looseness and filler sentences?

The test is whether a sentence updates the situation or the document. Sentences reporting events, data, or the narrator's judgment state are keepable looseness; sentences only describing what the chapter does next are filler and should be deleted or rewritten.

When should theory or concepts be introduced in an explanatory article?

Introduce theory only after creating a nameless discomfort in the reader, using it as a label rather than an answer. Presenting theory first and confirming with examples afterward robs readers of the discovery experience.

What are the limitations of this writing guideline?

The rules target Japanese expository and essay-style prose, not fiction with narrative scenes or non-Japanese writing. It also requires pairing with the japanese-tech-writing skill, and it forbids manufacturing rhythm from material not present in the subject matter.