cognitive-rhythm-writing

Designs pacing and tension in Japanese expository prose through cognitive-mode switching rules.

33|1|Updated Jul 24, 2022
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mimikun/dotfiles --skill cognitive-rhythm-writing-mimikun
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cognitive-rhythm-writing
Source: https://github.com/mimikun/dotfiles/tree/main/dot_claude/skills/cognitive-rhythm-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mimikun/dotfiles --skill cognitive-rhythm-writing-mimikun

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Dense, information-rich Japanese writing often reads as flat and boring because every paragraph is written in the same cognitive mode. This Skill provides a normative rulebook for designing rhythm (緩急) in explanatory prose by deliberately switching the reader's cognitive modes—observation, hesitation, assertion, re-observation—and by managing unresolved tension so readers keep reading. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Sentence and paragraph rhythm design: Defines beat patterns (short setup, long flow, short stop), density waveforms across paragraphs, and rules for alternating assertion with hesitation. - Tension and question management: Keeps at least one unresolved question open, prescribes how to open chapters and sections, land enumerations on concrete scenes, and close by grounding abstractions in the reader's concrete experience. - Mechanical post-draft inspection: Provides a five-step checklist (topic test, vocabulary leakage test, tension ledger, beat check, boundary check) plus a symptom-to-prescription table for diagnosing flat drafts. - Use Case: When a technical article or chapter is accurate but dull, apply the diagnostic table to identify the cause (e.g., theory introduced before the reader feels the problem) and rewrite using the prescribed section-entry and tension-recovery patterns. ## Quick Start Read the attached draft of my Japanese explanatory article and diagnose why it feels flat, then rewrite the opening and section transitions following the cognitive rhythm rules.

Frequently Asked Questions about cognitive-rhythm-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make dense Japanese explanatory writing less boring?

Flatness comes from writing everything in one cognitive mode, not from information density. Alternate observation, hesitation, assertion, and re-observation, and keep at least one unresolved question open so readers always have a reason to continue.

How to diagnose a draft that is correct but not engaging?

Use the symptom-to-prescription table: uniform paragraph tone means missing sentence beats, no reading momentum means no unresolved tension, and cold theory sections mean theory appeared before the reader felt the problem. Then apply the five-step inspection checklist.

What is the difference between intentional looseness and filler sentences?

The test is whether a sentence updates the situation or the document. Sentences conveying events, data, or the narrator's judgment state are acceptable looseness; sentences only describing the text itself, like progress announcements, are filler to delete.

Does this writing method work for non-narrative technical articles?

Yes. For expository text without story scenes, tension is built from the subject's own properties such as data, trade-offs, and violated expectations, plus the reader's anticipated objections, rather than from narrating the document's progress.

When should I not shorten sentences to create rhythm?

Do not cut context-sharing sentences in introductions, such as scope, viewpoint, and open issues, just to make prose shorter. That creates gaps, not rhythm; density editing applies only after shared context is established.